
Stephanie Sy, Abigail Whitney, Sophia Walker, Kevin Bundy and Jake Epstein in Eureka Day | Photo by Elana Emer Photography
There is nothing inherently egregious about them in theory, in practice, however there are few common, mundane phenomena I find as insufferable as committees and discourse. Now hold up, I am not talking about teams and conversation. Those are different things. Do you know what I mean? I’m sure Jonathan Spector does. His play Eureka Day, a deftly constructed and humanistic satire, slyly acknowledges that distinction. Coal Mine Theatre’s Canadian premiere production, staged with thoroughly convincing verisimilitude by Mitchell Cushman, is solid, deeply satisfying and, for me at least, anxiety inducing.
From the very first scene, my hackles were raised. We’re dropped into a board meeting for the Eureka Day private school. The whole vibe is immediately disconcerting. For starters, our five adult characters are meeting awkwardly in an elementary school classroom, surrounded by miniature furniture and an almost oppressive facade of hyper-inclusive, socially conscious messaging. Steve Lucas and Beckie Morris’ clever set feels authentic, our eyes land on details that seem cheery and empowering on their surface, but the gestalt is uncomfortably propagandistic.
And then people begin to talk and we are acutely aware they are part of that oppressive facade. Though everyone is trying so very hard to acknowledge and affirm, you can feel the tension building just under the surface. The woke language is cringe-worthy—not conceptually, the ideas are sound, but as rhetoric, which can be both a barricade and a weapon.
This opening scene is Carina’s (Sophia Walker) introduction to the board. The circle they form favours the other members—Don (Kevin Bundy), Eli (Jake Epstein), Suzanne (Sarah McVie) and Meiko (Stephanie Sy)—so that Carina, her back to us, feels like an audience surrogate, from whose perspective these well-meaning individuals seem almost cult-like, a tidal wave of communal energy. Eli’s exuberant insistence that they change a bit of administrative language to accommodate some niche identity, and the semantic wrangling that results, gives us a good sense of their dynamic, which is pleasant yet strained, where that language of acknowledgment and inclusivity, though well-intentioned, stalls actual communication.
The catalyst for drama here is an outbreak of mumps and a health official’s declaration that the school must be quarantined and a vaccination mandate put in place, clashing with the school’s libertarian ideals. Essentially, their official interactions are a series of debates between public safety and personal freedom. Everyone here, on both sides of the debate, gets their fair share of gotcha moments.
There are some personal dramas unfolding in tandem with the larger discussion. Eli is having an open and accepted affair with Meiko, a plot point that gives heightened angst to some of the later scenes, but also seems designed to show us how progressive and free-thinking these folks consider themselves to be. Eli’s unvaccinated child getting seriously ill from the mumps outbreak is one of the more dire circumstances to develop here and Epstein’s portrayal becomes intensely sympathetic as his manic enthusiasm gives way to abject worry.
For the most part, I found myself most firmly identifying with Walker’s Carina. Her attitude most fully aligned with my own and, I sense, Spector’s. Though she dutifully abides by the board’s many rigid mandates in terms of language and deportment, Walker communicates her frustration in subtle tells. I was rather surprised and very moved by an intimate discussion between her and McVie’s Suzanne, the most militant anti-vaxxer amongst them and a sort of specific antagonist for Carina. Her whole deal seems little flakey until she confides to her a traumatic personal experience. McVie is viscerally emotive here and Walker does a truly masterful job of gradually allowing her icy barrier from an earlier offence to melt away.
Spector has established a pattern here that feels meaningful: the group scenes of official board business are stilted, hokey and ineffectual. As Don, the affable peacemaker, Bundy is endearing and embodies the genial impotence of the board’s rhetorical skirmishes. But in off-the-clock moments between meetings, these characters allow themselves to be genuinely vulnerable and honestly communicative. It’s a striking dichotomy.
The most hilarious and exhilarating episode here is the town hall sequence, in which the board tries to engage in “Community Activated Conversation,” via livestream, to address the situation with the parents. The comments section (seen projected on the classroom’s whiteboard) blows up with increasingly outrageous arguments that have become a trademark of online discourse and the scene devolves into glorious chaos. The pacing and escalation are superb. The one drawback is that the rapid-fire comments and onstage cacophony make it difficult to register what the cast is actually saying, though I think this is partially deliberate.
Sy’s delivery of Meiko’s out-of-left-field, increasingly fervid rant about industrialization leading to our current horror show of entrenched societal delusion is a funny, stirring highlight.
An element of the production that added to the ominous atmosphere is the projected date and time that opens each scene. Triggering our spidey-sense, this simple storytelling conceit indicates, by connotation, that we are tracking a developing situation that will likely result in unpleasantness.
Bookended by a playground ball hitting the window, this cloistered environment feels both immersed in and secluded from the world outside the classroom. These interactions occur during off-hours, when the children whose interests these discussions are apparently intended to protect have all gone home. These balls hitting the window, and a morning announcement from a couple of those children reverberating in the space prior to the first scene, are a crucial bit of atmospheric world building that make this feel all the more real.
Truly great satire is hard to achieve because, if done well, you can’t quite discern what is to be taken at face value and what is shrewd thematic engineering. Eureka Day is very real, so naturally resonant, that you can’t extricate its messaging from the tender humanity that defines it. This is a grounded rendering of an insightful and dextrous play.


Pingback: Istvan Reviews ➤ SYNDROME ⏤ Theatre Direct